A week or so ago 485 airlines were brought to their knees when a check-in system provided by Amadeus failed. The outage was 3 1/2 hours. Qantas was probably the worst affected as the outage struck at 5pm Sydney/Melbourne time on a weekday.As we are are more and more encouraged (well, pushed really) to adopt technology to self-service we do increase these major risks to delivery.
Is the speed of transaction plus the ability to cut staffing levels so much cheaper when you factor in the losses of when things fail? I don't really mind when organisations such as Jestar do their sums and say 'yes' to this question. But I expect most organisations do not even consider to factor it in.
But there you go, expect to see more and more of this in every aspect of your daily life as self-service is only on the increase. Not that's necessarily a bad thing, in fact I often like to self-serve, I like the consistency of this kind of service. However, if the manual backup hasn't been factored in, the continuity of the service is compromised.
Oh, and before I close, Amadeus, we're all still waiting.
Qantas had the same problem reported in the news today.
ReplyDeleteI do give qantas a tick for actually having a manual process but in this technology age this is insufficient to adequately provide the service they offer.
Amadeus is again blamed, and they may indeed be at fault, but Qantas has a duty to provide services to their customers in good faith.
I would argue the 3 top priorities that Qantas should have is
1. selling tickets
2. keeping planes safely in the air
3. getting customers onto planes in a timely fashion
If their service agreement with Amadeus is insufficient to deliver number 3 then they should be reassessing the agreement.
Qantas has an image to uphold, unlike its subsiduary Jetstar who would just shrug and say "well you did buy cheap and nasty".